Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Politics...smh

Out With The Old, In With The New


How to construct the perfect city. In order to design a flawless metropolitan one must define a city. In return, grasp it’s meaning. Following step one, this comprehension leads to a discovery of social accomplishments within the city’s streets. One must be conscious of the negative influences that may penetrate a city’s tradition. As technology increases so does unethical ideologies that pave the way for the City of Tomorrow. When the City of the Old’s last voice passed, society’s heart was left unguarded. Capital means produced capital ends. A perfect city has absolute fairness where the end justifies the means in city planning. Keep in mind that the major factor concerning the growth and development of cities is trust. For example, a city once considered the place to be, the greatest of its time, was Pre-World War II New York City. With the old stems the new followed by a hope for a balance. One-sided politicians need to be viewed with caution for they hold all the power.
A city is complex resulting in an array of interpretations. For the sake of argument, I choose to define a city with a traditional gist. A city is a home to its people. A city is comprised of communities where its inhabitants acquire a sense of belonging, the basis of human endeavors. Cities, regardless of their size and population, generate positive growth by accommodating those of diverse cultures and economic limitations. By the end of WWII, New York City started to change socially and economically. In previous years, the essentials of American life were met. A manufacturing town, New York City was viewed at the highest point. Men with minimal education could pass as working class men. Jobs were more guaranteed given the triumphs of industrialization. Families had the time to be families sparking functional people to be proud of themselves and of others. The strength of New York City was its large amount of diverse immigrants. The street was the living room coexisting in a world where poor people could be happy.
Robert Moses left his mark on New York City soil. Although deemed a controversial figure in urban planning, Moses looked to the future. What he envisioned makes New York City the place it is today. The buildings, roads, and parkways defined his City of Tomorrow, which is enjoyed and loved to date. Moses was always an onlooker; he never wanted to experience city life nor saw it fit to live in. Robert Moses was an artist. He saw New York City as a canvas, one huge wonderful mural, which only he could embody with promise. The tourist attractions of adored New York City once homed actual communities, a time when one could use community and neighborhood interchangeably. The poor no longer wore smiles as the middle class dwindled in its members creating gaps, economically and physically. With the new replacing the old a different sense of community emerged fueled with Robert Moses’ influence. I presume, based on Moses’ dehumanization of a once great city, that he will be remembered as the man who misjudged a contentious ideology; the end justifies the mean.
Slum living. Once crowded streets are now housed in tall stories called housing developments. The City of Tomorrow vision caters to cooperate organizations stationed in the working district. Those who do not live the city, either commuters for various reasons or sightseers, do not witness or know the steps that were taken to allow passage throughout the city. Jersey City, New Jersey took a different approach as far as growth and development is concerned. Constructors reused abandoned space and vacant buildings as opposed to demolishing them. No one needed to fear relocation because of Jersey City’s reclaiming-remodeling objective.
Politicians are powerful. Why? In order to be elected, one must gain the trust of those voting. With power comes greed that steers morals in the opposite direction of right. Money clouds ones judgment, leaving an unbalance in social class opportunities. Moses saw the automobile as the vehicle toward the City of Tomorrow. However, as technology evolves the car will slowly become less efficient as transportation becomes faster. New Yorkers’ trust that life would only get better was their downfall. Laws were put in place to hinder community life by severing ties to communal scenes. A little faith goes a long way and as long as those appointed harbor any misgivings city life is destined to be everything that it is not.



pictures:  
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Robert_Moses_with_Battery_Bridge_model.jpg http://slckismet.blogspot.com/2012/02/majesty-of-human-condition-in-artist.html